“Drought” is a naturally occurring phenomenon that occurs when precipitation is significantly below normal recorded levels, causing serious hydrological imbalances that adversely affect land resource production systems. Drought can be categorized as meteorological, hydrological, agricultural, and socioeconomic. The first three approaches deal with ways to measure drought as a physical phenomenon. The last deals with drought in terms of supply and demand, tracking the effects of water shortfall as it ripples through socioeconomic systems.

Drought is a complex and slowly encroaching natural hazard with significant and pervasive socio-economic and environmental impacts. The impacts of drought are long lasting and socio-economic factors tend to aggravate the effects of drought. Drought is known to cause the most deaths and displacement of people than any other natural disaster.

Water scarcity is one of the greatest challenges of the twenty first century. A 50% increase in the demand for water is expected by the end of 2050. With increasing population growth, especially in developing dryland areas, more and more people become dependent on fresh water supplies in lands that are degrading. Drought and water scarcity are considered to be the most important of all natural disasters, causing both at the short and long-term economic and ecological losses as well as significant secondary and tertiary impacts.

Drought preparedness is crucial to mitigate the impacts drought may have. Appropriate planning must be carried out to efficiently develop remedies for drought. Solutions should both respond to human needs, involving stakeholders where necessary, and preserve environmental quality.

Methods that help to avoid the consequences of drought, include:

  • Early Warning Systems (EWS): Declaring a drought too late can have a devastating impact on lives and livelihoods. EWS can guide affected countries by providing timely information that can be used to reduce drought-related risks and to better prepare an effective response. 
  • Vulnerability and risk assessment: Actions to protect the most vulnerable to drought is prerequisite for EWS to work. Social, economic, and environmental factors need to be taken into account in order to assess the vulnerability. It is important to combine better forecasts with detailed knowledge on how landscapes and societies respond to a lack of rain and water, and turn that knowledge into early intervention.
  • Drought risk mitigation measures: Proactive drought risk management could save lives and the livelihoods of millions of people. For example, the development of sustainable irrigation schemes for crops and livestock or water harvesting schemes could boost the recycling and reuse of water, explore the cultivation of more drought tolerant crops, expand crop insurance schemes and establish of alternative livelihoods that can provide income in drought-prone areas.

Malta and Drought

Malta has no large and permanent river systems. Inland surface water systems are small and linked to the dynamics of several dry river valleys, locally called widien and their associated catchments. Given their small size, the Maltese islands were integrated into one water catchment district under Article 3 of the EU Water Framework Directive. This water catchment district consists of all hydrological sub-catchments, coastal waters up to one nautical mile from the baseline and all groundwaters.

With a limited volume of freshwater resources and a population of approximately 434,000, Malta ranks highest in the list of European countries most heavily affected by water scarcity and in the top 10 most water-stressed countries globally.

In addition to the constraints of a relatively limited volume of freshwater, the Maltese freshwater resources also face significant risks relating to its quality. Groundwater quality is reportedly deteriorating, chiefly as a result of nitrate leaching. Excluding aquifer recharge, the levels of water abstraction are reportedly 50% higher than required levels for sustainable management. Another threat impacting on groundwater resources is saline intrusion. Groundwater quality has deteriorated and there might be in the future, implications for its suitability for irrigation. Saline intrusion is an important issue as irrigation with brackish water can have major implications for the quality and quantity of agricultural yields. Also, in the longer term could have detrimental effects on the quality and sustainability of agricultural soils.

Climate change is also expected to exacerbate drought and the related water risks in Malta. Climate projections for the region for the end of the 21st century show precipitation decreases of between 5% and 15% and between 20% to more than 25% for the stabilization and high-end climate (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) scenarios. In addition, concentration of rainfall to fewer higher intensity events is expected. These new climate patterns are expected to further compound drought and water availability issues.

 

 

For agriculture, climate change is expected to impact directly the Mediterranean region, causing decreases in crop yield, increased risks of crop failure and increases in irrigation demand. Growing seasons are expected to shorten while plant heat stress during vital periods of crop development will increase. Moreover, the higher intensity rainfall events during the sowing period may also increase the risks linked to soil erosion and flash flooding.

A number of actions must to be taken in Malta to tackle drought issues including the reduction of over-abstraction and the introduction of more efficient irrigation techniques. These actions are of utmost importance as groundwater is vital for supporting various economic sectors (including agricultural production), food security and rural livelihoods. Priority actions relating to better management of water need to reflect both the environmental and economical pillars. Such an approach is fundamental to the successful implementation a strategy that mitigates the risks of drought.

Landscape

“Landscape” means an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factor. A landscape includes the physical elements of geophysically defined landforms such as mountains, hills, water bodies such as rivers, lakes, ponds and the sea, living elements of land cover including indigenous vegetation, human elements including different forms of land use, buildings, and structures, and transitory elements such as lighting and weather conditions. Combining both their physical origins and the cultural overlay of human presence, often created over millennia, landscapes reflect a living synthesis of people and place that is vital to local and national identity.

European Landscape Convention – Council of Europe

The European Landscape Convention (ELC), also known as the Florence Convention, was adopted in Strasbourg by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 19 July 2000 and was opened for signature in Florence in October 2000. As of 10th October 2022, 40 countries have ratified the Convention, Malta has signed the Convention on 20th October 2000, and has not yet ratified.

The main objectives of the ELC are to promote landscape protection, management and planning, and to organise co-operation on landscape issues between Parties to the Convention. The Convention applies to the entire territory of the Parties and covers all landscapes, natural, rural, urban and peri-urban areas, whether on land, inland water or marine areas. It concerns not just remarkable landscapes but also ordinary everyday landscapes and degraded areas.

The Protocol amending the ELC was concluded in 2016 and is open for ratification, acceptance or approval by the Parties to the Convention. The amendment caters for the promotion of European co-operation with non-European States who wish to implement the provisions of the Convention, it does not affect the substance of the Convention and State Party obligations therein.

The preamble of the Convention states that: ‘The landscape has an important public interest role in the cultural, ecological, environmental and social fields, and constitutes a resource favourable to economic activity and whose protection, management and planning can contribute to job creation; contributes to the formation of local cultures and is a basic component of the European natural and cultural heritage, contributing to human well-being and consolidation of the European identity’. The landscape, and its protection and sustainable management, thus contributes to quality of life.

Besides the environmental, economical and social benefits that the implementation of the Convention will bring, it will also indirectly help Malta achieve its national and EU objectives in relation to environmental protection. Green Infrastructure and landscape planning is viewed as being one of the main tools to tackle threats on biodiversity resulting from habitat fragmentation, land use change and loss of habitats. It is also regarded as a tool for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

The ELC specifically requires Parties to undertake the following obligations:

  1. To recognise landscapes in law as an essential component of people’s surroundings, an expression of the diversity of their shared cultural and natural heritage, and a foundation of their identity;
  2. To identify and assess landscape and define landscape quality objectives for the landscapes identified and assessed after public consultation;
  3. To establish and implement landscape policies aimed at landscape protection, management and planning through the adoption of the specific measures and instruments;
  4. To establish procedures for the participation of the general public and stakeholders with an interest in the definition and implementation of the landscape policies;
  5. To increase awareness, training and education of the value and role of landscapes, their appraisal and management, and changes to them;
  6. To integrate landscape into its regional and town planning policies and in its cultural, environmental, agricultural, social and economic policies, as well as in any other policies with possible direct or indirect impact on landscape.

The Council of Europe intergovernmental committees supervise the Convention’s implementation. The Convention also provides for a Council of Europe Landscape award, to be given to local or regional authorities or an NGO which introduced exemplary and long-lasting policies or measures to protect, manage and plan landscapes.

At national level, the main provisions of the ELC are addressed through Maltese planning and environmental legislation (particularly in the Development Planning Act, Environment Protection Act, Cultural Heritage Act, as well as the Local Plans).

For additional information on Maltese Landscapes, the following may be of relevance – Landscape Diversity and Protection in Malta.

Geomorphology of Malta

The Maltese Islands consist of an archipelago of three main inhabited islands and a number of smaller uninhabited ones, which lie roughly at the centre of the Mediterranean Sea. The islands cover a total area of 316 square kilometres.

 

The Maltese geology consists of rock layers with varying hardness and subsequent tectonic processes have affect their weathering. These factors have had a marked effect on the Island’s geomorphology and produced a remarkable variety of landscapes.

Landscapes are areas, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factor. A landscape includes the physical elements of geophysically defined landforms, living elements of land cover including indigenous vegetation and human elements including different forms of land use. Combining both their physical origins and the cultural overlay of human presence, landscapes reflect a living synthesis of people and place that is vital to local and national identity.

The character of a landscape helps define the self-image of the people who inhabit it and a sense of place that differentiates one region from other regions. It is the dynamic backdrop to people’s lives. The European Landscape Convention (ELC), also known as the Florence Convention, was adopted in Strasbourg by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 19 July 2000 and was opened for signature in Florence in October 2000.

European Landscape Convention – Council of Europe

The main objectives of the European Landscape Convention (ELC) are to promote landscape protection, management and planning, and to organise co-operation on landscape issues between Parties to the Convention. The Convention applies to the entire territory of the Parties and covers all landscapes, natural, rural, urban and peri-urban areas, whether on land, inland water or marine areas. It concerns not just remarkable landscapes but also ordinary everyday landscapes and degraded areas.

The preamble of the Convention states that: ‘The landscape has an important public interest role in the cultural, ecological, environmental and social fields, and constitutes a resource favourable to economic activity and whose protection, management and planning can contribute to job creation; contributes to the formation of local cultures and is a basic component of the European natural and cultural heritage, contributing to human well-being and consolidation of the European identity’. The landscape, and its protection and sustainable management, thus contributes to quality of life.

Particularly for a small and densely populated country such as Malta, it is crucial improve the protection of the landscape and increase the public’s awareness about its importance. Implementing ELC would assist in achieving these objectives, and would ultimately result in improving people’s quality of life, and have multiplier effects in other sectors. Thus, the implementation of the ELC in Malta has environmental, economic and social benefits.

At national level, the main provisions of the ELC are already partially covered from existing regulations of the Maltese planning and environmental legislation (particularly in the Development Planning Act, Environment Protection Act, Cultural Heritage Act, as well as the Local Plans). However, additional legislation is needed to specifically recognise landscapes in law and provide for the designation of competencies, criteria for the assessment of landscapes and the identification of landscapes of particular importance. Furthermore, areas exhibiting features of landscape value would need to be identified and assessed so as to afford them better protect. Although work has already been carried out and published by MEPA in 2003, further efforts need to be done.

Areas protected for landscape value – Malta

The Maltese landscape has an attractive and distinctive character and their protection and sustainable management has significant environmental, economic and social benefits. The natural and rural landscapes of the islands are dominated by karstic rock formations, Mediterranean-type flora and terraced agricultural fields. Humans have inhabited the islands for at least 7000 years, while natural processes have influenced the Maltese landscape character over time.

Mdina

Various Maltese regulations afford protection to landscapes through inter alia the Development Planning Act, the Environment Protection Act, and the Cultural Heritage Act. Additionally, the protection of landscape is included in a number of policies and strategies including Malta’s National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan and the Water Catchment Management Plan (WCMP). Furthermore, environmental assessment processes allow for informed decision-making that considers the value of Malta’s landscape and its landscape features.

With respect to the designation of areas through national law, Malta has achieved a coverage of 28.5% of its land area and 35.5% of its Fisheries Management Zone. This implies the protection, management and planning of natural aspects and beyond. Some of the different national designations include: Area of Ecological Importance, Site of Scientific Importance, Area of High Landscape Value, Bird Sanctuary, Nature Reserve, Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Tree Protection Area.

Regarding those areas which form part of the EU Natura 2000 network, management plans or conservation orders have been published for the terrestrial sites, while conservation objectives and measures are being drafted for the marine sites. Such measures take into consideration ecological restoration, regulation of certain activities and public awareness initiatives, amongst others.

Areas of High Landscape Value (AHLV) have been designated under the provisions of the Development Planning Act in 1996, 2000 and 2006, and through the local planning process. During 2006, 5 local plans were approved, and together with the designation of Ghajn Barrani in Gozo, brought on board 42km2 of new AHLVs. The proportion of legally protected landscapes in the Maltese Islands is now 33% of total land area, almost 3 times more than in 2000. The newly protected areas reflect the findings of the Landscape Assessment Study, which had identified that over 51% of the Maltese Islands had high or very high landscape sensitivity. The total protected area identified as landscape is 105.69m2, which is the 33.45% of the total land area of the Maltese islands.

 

Landscape Diversity

Malta’s natural landscape is characterised by karstic rock and typical Mediterranean vegetation, which is mostly determined by its geomorphology, climate, biodiversity and different settlement patterns and practices, including agriculture.

The main landscape features are as follows:

Islands and Sea: the main landscape of the islands is the sea and is archipelago, with three main inhabited islands: Malta, Gozo and Comino, and several uninhabited islets of which the most notable ones, in order of decreasing size, are St Paul’s Island, Cominotto, Filfla and Fungus Rock.

 

Blue Lagoon, Comino

 

Geology: this includes the softer Globigerina Limestone with more gently sloping landscapes, particularly along the eastern and south-eastern coastal areas of Malta, and Upper Coralline Limestone cliffs and rdum characterising the northern and north-western regions. Blue Clay overlies the Globigerina Limestone and tends to form clay slopes flowing out over the underlying rock, whilst Greensand provides for coloured landscapes when attaining large thickness. The geology of Gozo is more varied than that of Malta, with more frequent outcrops of Blue Clay being a characteristic feature.

Gozo coast – Xlendi

 

Cliffs and boulder screes, known as rdum (plural: rdumijiet), which house unique rdum communities based on endemic plants and animals unique to the Maltese Islands.

Rifting in the vicinity of the Maltese Islands has resulted in alternate uplifting of various regions of the Maltese Islands. This has given the archipelago a tilt towards the north-east thus creating two main types of coasts. The low indented shoreline of the east is contrasted with the sheer, rectilinear coasts of west Malta. The highest point (253m) on the islands can be found at Dingli cliffs in south western Malta; while the eastern coastlines are drowned. This tilt of the archipelago is also responsible for the predominant north-eastern trend of drainage channels on Malta.

Cliffs of two types can be found along the Maltese archipelago, vertical plunging cliffs and rdum or coastal scree cliffs. Vertical plunging cliffs are formed from Lower Coralline limestone and Upper Coralline Limestone. These lack shore platforms at their feet due to the absence of mass movement processes and are probably tectonic in origin. The rdum or coastal scree cliffs occur when marls of Blue Clay formations are overlaid by upper coralline limestone. The unconsolidated Blue Clay are easily eroded by wave action. After torrential rains water percolates through the overlying limestone fissures resulting in the saturation of the clay. This causes the clay to become plastic and mudslides may occur. The Upper Coralline Limestone on top is undercut and rock falls also occur. A gradual cliff retreat occurs as a result of this. The rdum cliffs are common in the north western side of Malta due to the extensive Upper Coralline Limestone plateau found.

The north-east side of Malta and north of Gozo are lacking in cliff formations. The coasts here are more stable as the geological structure is mainly composed of Globigerina Limestone and Lower Coralline Limestone. Long tracts of low, rocky coastlines of corrosion are found instead. Pools and Lapis characterise this landscape of low lying rocky shoreline. The platforms are jagged especially when cut in Coralline Limestone. Paskoff mentions the two most significant weathering processes, chemical and biological, that prevail in the area. The physical process of abrasion seems to be mostly absent.

Several coastal platforms rising to different levels are found on this type of coast. Platforms in northern Gozo form where Globigerina limestone crops out. Large boulders dislodged by storm waves can be seen scattered on platforms only on exposed coasts. Notches are also found. Beach formation is restricted to the northern shores of the Malta. The lack of beaches means concentrated tourism threats to the rare ecosystems found on the pocket beaches of the Islands.

Ta’ Ċenċ cliffs, Gozo

Maltese Faults

Magħlaq Fault Face (Credit: Limestone Isles in a Crystal Sea: The Geology of the Maltese Islands)

Malta is crossed by two main fault systems representing the effects of two separate rifting episodes in the vicinity of the archipelago. The older of the two, the Victoria Lines Fault (Great Fault), trends SW to NE, while the Maghlaq Fault system trends approximately NW to SE along the southern coast of the island and has been responsible for the down throw of Filfla to sea level.

A system of horst and graben structures of east-northeast trend gives rise to a series of rifts and valleys north of the Victoria Lines Fault. No well-defined horst and graben systems occur south of the Victoria Lines Fault. Several circular subsidence structures are distributed throughout the islands. The origins of these structures are various, but are mainly associated with solution of limestone by percolating acidified ground water leading to roof collapse of subterranean or submarine caverns.

Structural map of the Maltese Islands (Credit: Limestone Isles in a Crystal Sea: The Geology of the Maltese Islands)

 

Maltese Caves

Trenhaile (1987), Paskoff (1985) and Pedley et al (2002) mention various types of karstic landforms that give the relatively short coastline of the Islands a variety of geomorphic features. The presence of partially or totally submerged karst caves influences the development of coastal scenery around the islands. Paskoff and Trenhaile (1987) mention semicircular coves or circular subsidence structures (see opposite figure) that are distributed throughout the islands. The origins of these structures are various, but are mainly associated with solution of limestone by percolating acidified ground water leading to roof collapse of subterranean or submarine caverns. Wave action during storms can also provoke roof collapse hence forming such coves. These are evident in the southern coast of Malta. The many inlets found are partially drowned valleys of subaerial erosion. Calanques mentioned by Paskoff (1985) are ‘coastal inlets which can be of a gorge-like’ nature. According to Paskoff and Sanlaville (1978) these calanques are fault controlled.

Tal-Mixta Cave, Gozo

 

A system of valleys, known as widien (singular: wied), which form an intricate network through which seasonal watercourses pass. Such widien are important natural flood-relief systems and provide one of the characteristic landscape features of the Maltese Islands, which are of relevance to both natural riparian communities, fields and agricultural settlements.

Garrigues, including phrygana: often collectively known as ix-xagħri in Maltese, are the most characteristic natural landscape present, typically characterised by low shrubs growing on coralline limestones and karst. The most relevant example is the Maltese phrygana, a habitat endemic to the Maltese Islands, hence known only from Malta which is based on endemic species.

Steppes and grasslands are also common on limestones and blue clay, particularly clay slopes, with Esparto grass and sulla. These are known in Maltese with various names depending on the geology and soils of the area, the type of habitat and species found, and the use of the area; names include amongst others: il-baqqigħat; il-barr; il-bragier(a); il-ħawli(ja); il-karst, il-marġ(a)/l-imrajjaġ/l-imruġ; il-mergħat/l-imriegħi; il-qortin/il-kordin/il-qrajten; ix-xagħri/ix-xagħra and iż-żrieżaq tat-tafal.

Agriculture and parcelling. Due to Malta’s geomorphology and small size, most of the agricultural holdings are small and surrounded by traditional dry stone walls, often referred to as rubble wall or ħitan tas-sejjieħ in Maltese. of the islands. These walls provide against erosion, but are also important for many plant and animal species.

Fortifications, bastions and urban settlements have also created particular landscapes, and gave Malta the name of ‘island fortress’. This is particularly noted considering the various defensive structures in the Maltese Islands, of which Valletta and the Three Cities, Mdina, the Gozo Citadel, the so-called de Redin towers and the Victoria Lines are the most notable examples.

Grand Harbour, Valletta

ERA has proposed a Geology, Geomorphology, Soil & Landscapes Strategic Action Plan. The Environment and Resources Authority is in the process of developing national legislation such that areas exhibiting features of geological, geomorphological and landscape value can be designated as sites of geological/geomorphological/landscape importance.

The Environment and Resources Authority also proposed research initiatives relating to geology, geomorphology and natural/semi-natural landscapes across the Maltese Islands. As a result of this research, sites containing features of importance will be identified. Sites containing features of geological, geomorphological and landscape value may be the considered for inclusions as UNESCO Global Geoparks and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.

The World Heritage Convention

The most significant feature of the 1972 World Heritage Convention is that it links together in a single document the concepts of nature conservation and the preservation of cultural properties. The Convention recognizes the way in which people interact with nature, and the fundamental need to preserve the balance between the two.

The Convention sets out the duties of States Parties in identifying potential sites and their role in protecting and preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to conserve not only the World Heritage sites situated on its territory, but also to protect its national heritage. The States Parties are encouraged to integrate the protection of the cultural and natural heritage into regional planning programmes, set up staff and services at their sites, undertake scientific and technical conservation research and adopt measures which give this heritage a function in the day-to-day life of the community.

The overarching benefit of ratifying the World Heritage Convention is that of belonging to an international community of appreciation and concern for universally significant properties that embody a world of outstanding examples of cultural diversity and natural wealth.

The States Parties to the Convention, by joining hands to protect and cherish the world’s natural and cultural heritage, express a shared commitment to preserving our legacy for future generations.

The prestige that comes from being a State Party to the Convention and having sites inscribed on the World Heritage List often serves as a catalyst to raising awareness for heritage preservation. A key benefit of ratification, particularly for developing countries, is access to the World Heritage Fund.

The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention

The World Heritage Committee, the main body in charge of the implementation of the Convention, has developed precise criteria for the inscription of properties on the World Heritage List and for the provision of international assistance under the World Heritage Fund. To be included on the World Heritage List, sites must be of outstanding universal value and meet at least one out of ten selection criteria. These criteria are explained in the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention which, besides the text of the Convention, is the main working tool on World Heritage. The criteria are regularly revised by the Committee to reflect the evolution of the World Heritage concept itself.

Until the end of 2004, World Heritage sites were selected on the basis of six cultural and four natural criteria. With the adoption of the revised Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, only one set of ten criteria exists.

World Heritage List Nominations

Only countries that have signed the World Heritage Convention, pledging to protect their natural and cultural heritage, can submit nomination proposals for properties on their territory to be considered for inclusion in UNESCO’s World Heritage List.

Nomination process

Tentative List

The first step a country must take is to make an ‘inventory’ of its important natural and cultural heritage sites located within its boundaries. This ‘inventory’ is known as the Tentative List, and provides a forecast of the properties that a State Party may decide to submit for inscription in the next five to ten years and which may be updated at any time. It is an important step since the World Heritage Committee cannot consider a nomination for inscription on the World Heritage List unless the property has already been included on the State Party’s Tentative List.

The Nomination File

By preparing a Tentative List and selecting sites from it, a State Party can plan when to present a nomination file. The World Heritage Centre offers advice and assistance to the State Party in preparing this file, which needs to be as exhaustive as possible, making sure the necessary documentation and maps are included. The nomination is submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review and to check it is complete. Once a nomination file is complete the World Heritage Centre sends it to the appropriate Advisory Bodies for evaluation.

The Advisory Bodies

A nominated property is independently evaluated by two Advisory Bodies mandated by the World Heritage Convention: the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which respectively provide the World Heritage Committee with evaluations of the cultural and natural sites nominated. The third Advisory Body is the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), an intergovernmental organization which provides the Committee with expert advice on conservation of cultural sites, as well as on training activities.

The World Heritage Committee

Once a site has been nominated and evaluated, it is up to the intergovernmental World Heritage Committee to make the final decision on its inscription. Once a year, the Committee meets to decide which sites will be inscribed on the World Heritage List. It can also defer its decision and request further information on sites from the States Parties.

The Criteria for Selection

To be included on the World Heritage List, sites must be of outstanding universal value and meet at least one out of ten selection criteria. These criteria are explained in the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention which, besides the text of the Convention, is the main working tool on World Heritage. The criteria are regularly revised by the Committee to reflect the evolution of the World Heritage concept itself.

Until the end of 2004, World Heritage sites were selected on the basis of six cultural and four natural criteria. With the adoption of the revised Operational Guidelines, only one set of ten criteria exists.

Malta properties inscribed on the World Heritage List

Cultural (3)

City of Valletta (1980)
Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum (1980)
Megalithic Temples of Malta (1980, 1992)

Sites on the Tentative List (7)

Cittadella (Victoria – Gozo)  (1998)
Coastal Cliffs (1998)
Knights’ Fortifications around the Harbours of Malta  (1998)
Maltese Catacomb Complexes (1998)
Mdina (Citta’ Vecchia)  (1998)
Qawra/Dwejra  (1998)
Victoria Lines Fortifications  (1998)

UNESCO Global Geoparks

UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development.

There are four fundamental features to a UNESCO Global Geopark. These features are an absolute prerequisite for an area to become a UNESCO Global Geopark. The exact criteria for an area to become a UNESCO Global Geopark are set out in the Operational Guidelines for UNESCO Global Geoparks. There are 147 sites in the Global UNESCO Geoparks Network across 41 countries.

The four features that are fundamental to a UNESCO Global Geopark are:

  • Geological heritage of international value

    In order to become a UNESCO Global Geopark, the area must have geological heritage of international value. This is assessed by scientific professionals, as part of the “UNESCO Global Geopark Evaluation Team”. Based on the international peer-reviewed, published research conducted on the geological sites within the area, the scientific professionals make a globally comparative assessment to determine whether the geological sites constitute international value.

  • Management

    UNESCO Global Geoparks are managed by a body having legal existence recognized under national legislation. This management body should be appropriately equipped to address the entire area and should include all relevant local and regional actors and authorities. UNESCO Global Geoparks require a management plan, agreed upon by all the partners, that provides for the social and economic needs of the local populations, protects the landscape in which they live and conserves their cultural identity. This plan must be comprehensive, incorporating the governance, development, communication, protection, infrastructure, finances, and partnerships of the UNESCO Global Geopark.

  • Visibility

    UNESCO Global Geoparks promote sustainable local economic development mainly through geotourism. In order to stimulate the geotourism in the area, it is crucial that a UNESCO Global Geopark has visibility. Visitors as well as local people need to be able to find relevant information on the UNESCO Global Geopark. A UNESCO Global Geopark should also have a corporate identity.

  • Networking

    A UNESCO Global Geopark is not only about cooperation with the local people living in the UNESCO Global Geopark area, but also about cooperating with other UNESCO Global Geoparks through the Global Geoparks Network (GGN), and regional networks for UNESCO Global Geoparks, in order to learn from each other and, as a network, improve the quality of the label UNESCO Global Geopark. Working together with international partners is the main reason for UNESCO Global Geoparks to be a member of an international network such as the GGN. Membership of the GGN is obligatory for UNESCO Global Geoparks. By working together across borders, UNESCO Global Geoparks contribute to increasing understanding among different communities and as such help peace-building processes.

Disclaimer

The information below has been extracted from a digital record and is meant for general guidance.  The Compliance & Enforcement Directorate of ERA disclaims any responsibility for any inaccuracies there may be on this site.  If you wish to verify the correctness of any information, you are advised to send a request to: [email protected].  Furthermore, if there are any discrepancies between the information contained on this site and official printed communication, the latter prevails.

Last amended: Wed., 24 June 2020

Order Details
Order Date:Wed., 29 January 2020
Order Status: Order Closed. Daily Fines paid.
Daily Fine Paid/Settled:€100
Fine paid status:Fully paid.
Order type:Ordni ta' Waqfien u Konformità
Stop and Compliance Order
Location of Infringement:Sit fit Triq il-Magħtab, fil-limiti tan-Naxxar.
Local Council:In-Naxxar.
Infringement in Maltese (Official):Operazzjoni jew attività li tinkludi tfiegħ u rimi ta’ skart bi ksur tar-Regolamenti dwar l-Iskart (L.S. 549.63).
Infringement Summary in English:Unauthorized operation or activity of deposition and disposal of waste in breach of the Waste Regulations (S.L. 549.63).
Corresponding Investigation Case/sIF2334/19-D
Parties subject to OrderBezzina Carmel
Bezzina Christopher
Owner / Occupier
Contravention type:Unpermitted deposition of waste.

Disclaimer

The information below has been extracted from a digital record and is meant for general guidance.  The Compliance & Enforcement Directorate of ERA disclaims any responsibility for any inaccuracies there may be on this site.  If you wish to verify the correctness of any information, you are advised to send a request to: [email protected].  Furthermore, if there are any discrepancies between the information contained on this site and official printed communication, the latter prevails.

Last amended: Fri., 28 February 2020

Order Details
Order Date:Mon., 03 February 2020
Order Status: Order Closed. Daily Fines paid.
Daily Fine Paid/Settled:€100
Daily Fine payment status:Fully paid.
Order type:Ordni ta' Waqfien u Konformità
Stop and Compliance Order
Location of Infringement:‘Sammut Bros.’, Triq tal-Ħandaq, Tal-Ħandaq, fil-limiti ta’ Ħal Qormi.
Local Council:Ħal Qormi.
Infringement in Maltese (Official):Operazzjoni jew attività ta’ ħażna ta’ skart li jinkludi u mhux limitat għal karti, kartun kif ukoll plastik
mingħajr il-permessi meħtieġa, bi ksur tal-artiklu 58 ta’ l-Att dwar il-Protezzjoni tal-Ambjent, u ta’ regolamenti 12(5) u 19(1) tar-Regolamenti dwar l-Iskart (L.S.549.63).
Infringement Summary in English:Storage of various waste, including paper, cardboard and plastic, without the necessary permits.
Corresponding Investigation Case/sIF2345/19-F
Parties subject to OrderKasco Recycling Limited
Sammut Transport Limited
Owner / Occupier
Contravention type:Unpermitted storage of waste.

Disclaimer

The information below has been extracted from a digital record and is meant for general guidance.  The Compliance & Enforcement Directorate of ERA disclaims any responsibility for any inaccuracies there may be on this site.  If you wish to verify the correctness of any information, you are advised to send a request to: [email protected].  Furthermore, if there are any discrepancies between the information contained on this site and official printed communication, the latter prevails.

Last amended: Fri., 28 February 2020

Order Details
Order Date:Tue., 14 January 2020
Order Status: Order Closed. Daily Fines paid.
Fine Paid/Settled:€4,580
Fine paid status:Fully Paid.
Order type:Ordni ta' Waqfien u Konformità
Stop and Compliance Order
Location of Infringement:J.J. Borda Scrap Metals, 6, Valletta Road, Marsa.
Local Council:Il-Marsa.
Infringement in Maltese (Official):Operazzjoni jew attività ta’ ħażna u ta’ maniġġar ta’ skart li jinkludi u mhux limitat għal metall, air-conditioning units, ramm, stainless steel, electric motors, wires/cables, batteriji, radiators, tyres, kif ukoll Vetturi fi Tmiem Żmienhom mingħajr il-permessi meħtiega, bi ksur:
- tal-artiklu 58 tal-Att dwar il-Protezzjoni tal-Ambjent;
- tar-regolamenti 12 (5) u 19 (1) tar-Regolamenti dwar l-Iskart (L.S. 549.63);
- tar-regolament 6(2) tar-Regolamenti dwar l-Immaniġġar ta’ Skart (Vetturi fi Tmien Żmienhom) (L.S. 549.36); kif ukoll
- tar-regolament 9(1) tar-Regolamenti dwar l-Immaniġġjar tal-Iskart (Tagħmir Elettriku u Elettroniku) (L.S. 549.89).
Infringement Summary in English:Storage and management of various waste including, but not limited to, metals, air conditioning units, electric motors, wires, batteries, radiators, tyres and End of Life Vehicles (ELVs) without the necessary permits.
Corresponding Case/sIF2410/19-F
Parties subject to OrderJ.J. Borda Scrap Metals
Malta Industrial Parks Limited
Lands Authority
Owner / Occupier
Contravention type:Unpermitted storage and management of various waste, WEEE and ELVs.

Disclaimer

The information below has been extracted from a digital record and is meant for general guidance.  The Compliance & Enforcement Directorate of ERA disclaims any responsibility for any inaccuracies there may be on this site.  If you wish to verify the correctness of any information, you are advised to send a request to: [email protected].  Furthermore, if there are any discrepancies between the information contained on this site and official printed communication, the latter prevails.

Last amended: Thur., 17 August 2023

Order Details
Order Date:Tue., 04 February 2020
Order Status: Order Closed. Daily Fines paid.
Fine Paid/Settled:€13,350
Fine paid status:Fully paid.
Order type:Ordni ta' Waqfien u Konformità
Stop and Compliance Order
Location of Infringement:Barriera ex-HM 02, La Cava Operations, Ix-Xagħra Tal-Magħluq, fil-limiti tas-Siġġiewi.
Local Council:Is-Siġġiewi.
Infringement in Maltese (Official):Nuqqas ta’ konformità mal-kundizzjonijiet tal-Permess Ambjentali li jirregolaw fejn jista’ u fejn ma jistax isir depożitu ta’ materjal barra mill-ispazju mħaffer tal-barriera.
Infringement Summary in English:Non-conformity with environmental permit which regulates where waste could be deposited.
Corresponding Case/sIF0171/20-F
Parties subject to OrderLa Cava Operations
Tum Invest Limited
Owner / Occupier